Stringly Typed Booleans

I’m getting rather hacked off seeing boolean properties typed as strings. Stringly typed is a phrase I learnt off a post from the excellent Coding Horror blog and it describes a phenomena whereby properties that are of a specific type, e.g. Boolean, Date, int, are stored needlessly as strings.

I’m working on a website that communicates with a money laundering service to check whether an individual is “bad” or not. Individuals can pass the test, but importantly it is possible to pass the test with some warning flags raised. If any of the warning flags are raised then an email should be sent off to compliance for them to do…whatever it is they do. Fair enough right?

The warning flags are obviously booleans. There was either a warning raised or there wasn’t – there are no two ways about it (no pun intended). In the serialized response, the warning flags are encoded as “Yes” or “No”…which is understandable. Now, upon receiving the response, it is parsed and turned into an internal representation. This is where things get really weird. The programmer that coded the object that stores the response from the service has decided to encode the warnings as strings, initialised to “”. Which is totally fucking bonkers.

Why?

Well, now our boolean warnings aren’t really booleans – they have WAY more than two possible values and the meaning of these values is subjective. One may consider “”, null, “No” as false, but could conceivably also consider “false” or “0″. We get the same sort of problem with true – “Yes”, “1″, “true” and then we get a whole load of unknown values which is every other possible string in the world. Which might be considered to be true.

So how the hell can any number of programmers work on this piece of code without introducing errors because of differing definitions of truthy and falsey values? Well, they can’t. To illustrate the problem further, even loosely typed languages differ in their boolean coercion, for example JavaScript and PHP:

<script>
if("0") alert('Opposite day!');
</script>

<?php
if("0") echo 'Opposite day!';
?>

JavaScript considers “0″ true but PHP considers it false. Personally I think JavaScript is “right” here, but as I said before, it is totally subjective.

The icing on the cake is of course the extra code you have to write to check the truthy or falsey string values. Something along the lines of “if x is not null and not empty and not the word No then it is probably true…probably”, which would otherwise have been coded as “if x then true” if x was a boolean – which is orders of magnitude shorter.

Of course, there are some bat shit crazy strongly typed languages that allow you to assign null to a Boolean, but that is a different story altogether.

8 thoughts on “Stringly Typed Booleans

  1. I’ve just found a whole lot of stringly typed stuff in my company project. When I run “git blame” it blames a couple of former employees. Now I’m simultaneously glad they’re gone while wishing they were back here so they could explain the obfuscated mess they’ve left me!

  2. More large randomised clinical trials with sufficient study length and dose adequacy should be conducted to provide definitive evidence and have implications for clinical practice generic priligy However it is common for patients already on a downward trajectory to become difficult to wean from intravenous inotropic therapy

  3. Daddy smiled and said “ that is my good boy. Don’t even want to leave your daddy’s Ripe socks on the floor. That’s the respect I love boy.” I then was told to clean his left foot. “Scrub these whitish paste out in my toenails. I want you to smell and place them in your mouth and let me see.” Daddy commented. It smelled and tasted like Brie cheese. Then I moved my tongue in between daddy’s toes. I cleaned up so well. Just thought I was finished. Daddy said” the sole is clammy. It has nature feet oil after a whole day in the shoes you think you finished fag. Keep working on that.” filmy porno “I look forward to the day when you are a fully grown man my son.” His father says. “I am anxious to see the fruit of my loins reach his fully-adorned manhood. Adulthood.”

  4. “I bet you got some stares from the other boys in the locker room.” His dad adds. “You couldn’t miss it.” “Yes sir.” He says as he straightens up standing erect as his member pulses to life between his legs and in his father’s right hand which are firmly locked on his balls. “Yes sir I do.”

  5. “Lookin’ good son. Lookin’ good.” His dad says over the stream of the warm cleansing water as it caresses his mature man body. Garrett thinks to himself; he did not wear a jock home from practice. He was ‘going commando.” Is it his older brother’s jock? “Oh well. “He mumbles to himself as he takes another whiff of the musky scented pouch of the jock.

  6. “Yes Yes I know you understand.” His father proudly exclaims. “I knew ya couldn’t keep your hands off it.” His dad says. “Men can’t do it we are drawn to our cocks like a moth to a flame and usually that burning sensation that a man feels is the cum boiling up in our balls. You know that feelin’ doncha son?”

  7. His father loosens his grip on the full balls of his son as he stands. He can see the spurts of hair that dot the chest of his son. And he can see the heaving and gentle rise and fall of his son’s chest as he breathes as his excitement builds.

  8. The sound of the shower echoes throughout the empty house. The bathroom door is open. He knows he has privacy. He is alone. No older brother. No father. Or mother. It is just him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>