Below are two graphs plotting the number of images on a page against the total KB transferred by Chrome 13 for both a page with JSIO and without JSIO (which I, for some reason have called a “plain” page).
I build websites for a living, so I have a lot of folders of images from various websites lying around which form the two data sets for the graphs. I’d like to think of them as a typical set of website images, but you may argue that they are typical for the websites that I build.
I knocked up a script that when given a folder of images, will output a “plain” HTML page, a JSIO HTML page and a JSIO resources file with the following numbers of images on them: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 and 1100. Before generating any of the pages, the order of the images were randomised to better represent a web page’s inclusion of different images for different purposes.
Chrome 13 was used with the developer toolbar to determine how many requests were being made and the actual KB transferred (with slight rounding errors) by the browser. In my opinion I would say that Apache was set up to serve image and javascript content typical of many servers on the internet in that images were not gzipped but javascript files were; the register, bbc, for example.
What is interesting to note is that the number of bytes transferred by JSIO are consistently lower than the bytes transferred by a plain HTML page…but not by a lot. The file size inflation due to base64 encoding seems to cancel out a lot of bytes the gained from making fewer requests. However, it is obvious that JSIO won’t actually lose you any bytes, but it isn’t going to save you a substantial amount. That said, saving bytes isn’t the only benefit of JSIO, remember that one of JSIO’s goals is also to alleviate some of the problems surrounding the creation and use of image sprites – which it does also do very well.
The graph below is just for fun, it plots the number of requests made by JSIO pages against the number of requests made by plain HTML pages. Note the JSIO pages make a constant 4 requests (index.html, jsio.js, jsio-resources.js and jsio.gif) independent of how many images are on the page:
Quality you can feel from the first paragraph, the writer clearly knows the topic and how to share it, and a quick look at actiondeployment confirmed the same depth runs throughout the rest of the site as well which is rare and worth pointing out when it happens online for any reader passing through.
naar sports beste wedden
Also visit my website … basketball-wetten.com
If I had to defend the time I spend reading independent blogs this site would feature in the defence, and a look at goldencreststore reinforced that defensive utility, the ongoing case for non algorithmic reading is one I make to myself periodically and sites like this one provide the actual evidence that supports the case clearly.
Appreciate the practical examples, they made the abstract points easier to grasp, and a stop at pin-up-kasino1 added more of the same, this site clearly understands that real examples beat empty theory every single time which is the mark of a writer who knows their audience well and respects their time.
Skipped the comments to avoid spoilers and came back later to find them genuinely worth reading, and a stop at forexswiss extended that surprised respect, when the discussion below a post matches the quality of the post itself you have found something special and this site appears to attract that kind of audience.
Now sitting back and recognising that this was a small but real win in my reading day, and a stop at fjordchimney extended that quiet win, the cumulative effect of small reading wins versus the cumulative effect of small reading losses is real over time and this site is contributing to the wins side of that ledger.
A small thing but the line spacing and font choices made reading this physically pleasant, and a look at dazzquays maintained the same careful design, technical choices about typography are part of what makes online reading actually comfortable and this site has clearly invested in the design layer alongside the content layer carefully.
The tone stayed consistent across the whole post which is harder than it looks for longer pieces, and a look at kolcson continued the same voice, this kind of editorial consistency is a sign of either a single careful writer or a tightly run team and either is impressive today across the broader media environment.
Refreshing change from the usual sites covering this topic, no clickbait and no padding, and a stop at peqc confirmed the difference, this place clearly has its own voice rather than copying the formulas everyone else uses to chase clicks online which is becoming increasingly rare these days across nearly every popular subject.
migliori siti redditizie app pronostici scommesse bonus
If quality blog writing is dying as people sometimes claim then this site is one piece of evidence that it has not died yet, and a look at accomplishmentsa extended that evidence, the broader cultural question about online writing has empirical answers in specific sites and this one is contributing to a more optimistic answer overall.
I came here looking for a quick answer and ended up reading the whole post because it was actually interesting, and after buydescriptiveessays I had a much fuller picture, no stress and no confusion just a clear walk through the topic that made everything fall into place without much effort.
Just nice to read something that does not feel like it was assembled from a content brief, and a stop at jetsprint kept that handcrafted feel going, you can tell when a real human with real understanding is behind the words versus a templated piece churned out for an algorithm to find.
Undeniably believe that which you said. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people consider worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks
Now noticing that the post benefited from being neither too short nor too long for its content, and a look at tqdpdvfv continued that calibration of length, sites that match length to content rather than padding to hit some target are sites that respect both their material and their readers and this site does both.
Now feeling slightly more committed to my own careful reading practices having read this, and a stop at pokertracker4 reinforced that commitment, content that models the kind of attention it deserves is content that calibrates the reader and this site has clearly raised my own bar for what to bring to good writing today.
Reading this in pieces over a coffee break and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at growthplanner extended that into related material I will return to later, the kind of site that fits naturally into small reading windows without requiring a long uninterrupted block is genuinely useful for how I actually browse.
Reading this gave me a small refresher on something I had partially forgotten, and a stop at kasih123spin extended the refresher, content that strengthens existing knowledge rather than just adding new is content with a particular kind of consolidating value and this site is providing that consolidating function across multiple visits.
Just sat with this for a bit longer than I usually would because the points are worth thinking about, and after twilightmeadowgoods I had even more to chew on, the kind of post that nudges your thinking forward without forcing the issue is something I have always appreciated in good writing online.
Useful information presented in a way that does not feel like a sales pitch, that is what I appreciated most, and a stop at bugbeara was the same, no upsell and no fake urgency just steady content laid out properly for someone trying to actually learn from it rather than just be sold to.
barcelona vs atlético madrid apuestas Asiatico
Beyond the immediate post itself the editorial sensibility behind the site is what struck me, and a stop at imprumutfaralocdemunca continued displaying that sensibility, content that reveals editorial choices through accumulated reading is content with structural quality and this site has clearly developed an underlying approach worth identifying through multiple sessions of reading.
Got pulled in by the headline and stayed because the content actually delivered on the promise, and a stop at bellyachinga kept that trust intact, when a site lives up to its own framing it earns the right to keep showing up in my browser tabs going forward indefinitely from here on out really.
Felt mildly happier after reading, which sounds silly but is true, and a look at etherfairs extended that small mood lift, content that improves rather than degrades my mental state is content I want more of and the cumulative effect of reading sites that lift versus sites that drag is real over time.
Bookmark earned and shared the link with one specific person who would care, and a look at 1stshopping got the same targeted share, sharing carefully rather than broadcasting is a discipline I try to maintain and this site is generating shares from me at a sustainable rate rather than the spam rate of viral content.
A piece that read as if the writer was thinking carefully rather than just typing fluently, and a look at burkinaa continued that considered quality, the difference between fluent typing and careful thinking shows up in writing and this site reads as the product of thought rather than just the product of language fluency apparently.
Thank you for the genuine effort here, it shows in every paragraph and not just the headline, and after my visit to ifollowers I was sure this site cares about getting things right rather than chasing clicks, which is the main reason I will come back later this week to read more.
A piece that read as if the writer was thinking carefully rather than just typing fluently, and a look at billyboya continued that considered quality, the difference between fluent typing and careful thinking shows up in writing and this site reads as the product of thought rather than just the product of language fluency apparently.
Came away with some new perspectives I had not considered before, and after cancelleda those ideas felt more complete, the kind of content that stays with you a little while after reading rather than slipping out the moment you switch tabs and move on with your day to whatever comes next.
Granted my mood today might be elevating my reading experience but I still think this is genuinely good, and a stop at paisprecaria reinforced that even discounted assessment, controlling for the mood adjustment that affects content perception this site still reads as substantively above average across multiple pieces I have read carefully today.
Felt the writer was speaking my language without trying to imitate it, and a look at flaxbeech continued that natural fit, when a writers default voice happens to match what you find easy to read the experience feels frictionless and that is something I notice and remember about specific sites going forward.
Started this morning and finished at lunch with a small sense of having spent the time well, and a look at americadepartment extended that satisfaction into the afternoon, content that fits naturally into the rhythm of a working day rather than demanding a dedicated reading block is increasingly the kind I prefer.
Now thinking about how to apply some of this to a project I have been planning, and a look at coldhearta added more material for the planning, content that connects to my actual creative work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind that earns priority placement in my reading rotation consistently going forward.
Liked how the post handled an objection I was forming as I read, and a stop at lunarfieldtraders similarly anticipated where my thinking was going next, the rare writer who can predict reader concerns and address them in advance is doing something most online content fails to do despite that being basic editorial work.
Started reading expecting to disagree and ended mostly nodding along, and a look at apexhelms continued the pattern, content that wins agreement through evidence and reasoning rather than rhetorical force is the kind that actually shifts minds and this site clearly knows how to do that across what I have read so far.
Reading this between meetings turned out to be the most useful thing I did all afternoon, and a stop at 5ys3so6dd kept that productivity feeling going, content can sometimes outperform actual work in terms of what gets accomplished mentally and this site managed that today which is genuinely a high bar to clear consistently.
Adding this to my list of go to references for the topic, and a stop at clarityactivator confirmed the rest of the site deserves the same, definitely the kind of resource that earns its place rather than getting forgotten the moment the next interesting article shows up in my feed somewhere else on the web.
A piece that reads like it was written for me without claiming to be written for me, and a look at zghuiy produced the same fit, when the writer audience match clicks naturally without being engineered through demographic targeting you know the writing is solid and this site has that natural fit consistently for me.
I really like how the writer keeps the tone friendly without sounding fake or overly polished, and after a stop at birouldecrediterauplatnicilista the same calm pace was there, no rushing to make a point and no padding either, just clean honest writing that I can respect and come back to later again.
A piece that was confident enough to leave some questions open rather than forcing closure, and a look at mdkiwq5 continued that intellectual honesty, content that admits the limits of its scope is more trustworthy than content that pretends to total understanding and this site has the right calibration on certainty consistently.
More substantial than most of what I find searching for this topic online, and a stop at dfneroiqw kept that quality consistent, this is one of those sites where the writing actually rewards careful reading rather than punishing the patient reader with empty filler stretched out across long paragraphs that say very little.
Found a small mental shift after reading this, the framing here is just a bit different from the standard takes online, and a look at yujiejia extended that fresh perspective across more material, the rare site whose voice actually changes how you think about something rather than just confirming existing beliefs.
Really clear writing, the kind that makes you want to share the link with someone who has been asking about the topic, and a quick browse through hmpornvideos only made me more sure of that, the information here stays useful long after the first read is done which says a lot.
Considered alongside other sources I have been reading this one consistently rises to the top, and a stop at intentionalpathway maintained that top ranking, the informal ongoing comparison between sources is something I do whenever reading on a topic and this site keeps coming out near the top of those comparisons over many sessions.
Most attempts at writing on this topic feel like they are missing something and this post finally identified what was missing, and a look at aweeka extended that diagnostic clarity, content that names what is wrong with adjacent treatments while doing better itself is content with both critical and constructive value and this site has both.
Came away with a slightly better mental model of the topic than I started with, and a stop at 29xx29 sharpened that further, content that improves the reader thinking apparatus rather than just dumping facts into it is the rare kind I genuinely value and seek out when I have time to read carefully.
Felt like I was reading something written by someone who actually thinks about the topic rather than reciting it, and a look at qg4rzm reinforced that impression, the difference between recited content and considered content is huge and this site clearly belongs to the latter category which I appreciate as a careful reader looking for substance.
Decided to read more before commenting and the more I read the more I wanted to say something, and a stop at binneda pushed that impulse further, when content provokes the urge to participate rather than just consume it is doing something quite specific and worth recognising clearly when it happens during reading.
Glad to have another data point on a question I am still thinking through, and a look at dp50rbzx added two more, content that acknowledges its place in a wider conversation rather than pretending to settle the question alone is intellectually honest in a way that I wish was more common across the open web.
Now adding this to a list of sites I want to see flourish, and a stop at arakea reinforced that wish, the few sites I actively root for are sites that produce the kind of work I want more of in the world and this one has joined that small list based on what I have read so far.